Obama Case Dismissed by Federal Judge

November 1, 2009 by nightwatch7

In a surprise move Federal Judge David O. Carter has dismissed a lawsuit challenging Obama’s eligibility to be President under the Constitution. The judge had already set dates for the trial to continue to court on January 26th when he abruptly decided to dismiss the case.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114411

Judge Carter’s sudden change of mind is especially troubling as it has been learned that he recently hired a law clerk from the same law firm that has been defending Obama all this time to the tune of $1.66 million. Not surprisingly, the case will now be appealed.

Michelle Obama Contradicts Barack’s Birth Story

October 28, 2009 by nightwatch7

In remarks that received slight notice at the time, Michelle Obama contradicted her husband’s ”official” birth story at a 2008 round table meeting at the University of Missouri. She said that at the time of his birth Obama’s mother Ann Dunham was “very young and very single.”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114259 

Her remarks would seem to negate the claim that his mother was married at the time to his father Barack Obama Sr., which has long been assumed, though there is no record or photographs of the marriage and no one of the mother’s or father’s acquaintance has ever said they were at the wedding.

supreme_court1

U.S. Supreme Court

In a related article regarding Obama’s eligibility to be president under the Constitutional requirement that he be a “natural born” citizen, attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed an appeal with the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals claiming that the Congress of the United States violated its obligation under the Constitution to ascertain if Obama is eligible under Article 2, Section 1.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114256

He claims in part that the courts are committing treason to the Constitution by refusing to hear the case against Obama. As a basis for his claim, he quotes former U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, who in 1821, when ruling on the case Cohens vs. Virginia, wrote that the Court cannot refuse to hear a case that they would rather avoid for political or other reasons. The Court is obligated to hear cases brought before it. If Apuzzo is successful in his challenge, the Court will finally have to hear the case and a determination will be made whether Obama is a “natural born” citizen or not.

Obama Search Results on Internet Scrubbed

October 16, 2009 by nightwatch7

Further speculation about Obama’s birth place and his eligibility to be president have been refueled by recent revelations. Right on the heels of the release of a 2004 edition of the Standard newspaper from Kenya claiming that Obama is a Kenyan comes a report that other searches on the internet for articles on Obama from that time period are strangely missing.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=113004

According to John Charlton of Post & Email blog, a Google search for other articles on Obama being Kenyan-born are missing and have apparently been scrubbed from the site.  He could find no mention of Obama at all in any articles from 1981 to 2000 even though he was a political figure, and between Jan. 1, 2005 and April 12, 2006 no articles about Obama appear in any newspapers from around the world found on the search engine.  Would the search engine disable its own news archives regarding articles on Obama?  If so, why?

Obama Kenyan-Born States Newspaper (2004)

October 15, 2009 by nightwatch7
 
The East African Standard | Online Edition

East African Standard - Online Edition

  
Home
National
Sports
Special Reports
Commentaries
Intelligence
Letters
Editorial
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Big Issue | Financial Standard | Maddo | Pulse | Style | Society
  Sunday, June 27, 2004

    

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate


Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.

Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.

 
nh-obama.jpg (12114 bytes)
Barrack Obama

“It’s clear to me that a vigorous debate on the issues most likely could not take place if I remain in the race,” Ryan, 44, said in a statement. “What would take place, rather, is a brutal, scorched-earth campaign – the kind of campaign that has turned off so many voters, the kind of politics I refuse to play.

Although Ryan disputed the allegations, saying he and his wife went to one ‘avant-garde’ club in Paris and left because they felt uncomfortable, lashed out at the media and said it was “truly outrageous” that the Chicago Tribune got a judge to unseal the records.

The Republican choice will become an instant underdog in the campaign for the seat of retiring Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald, since Obama held a wide lead even before the scandal broke.

“I feel for him actually,” Obama told a Chicago TV station. “What he’s gone through over the last three days I think is something you wouldn’t wish on anybody.”

The Republican state committee must now choose a replacement for Ryan, who had won in the primaries against seven contenders. Its task is complicated by the fact that Obama holds a comfortable lead in the polls and is widely regarded as a rising Democratic star.

The chairwoman of the Illinois Republican Party, Judy Topinka, said at a news conference, after Ryan withdrew, that Republicans would probably take several weeks to settle on a new candidate.

“Obviously, this is a bad week for our party and our state,” she said.

As recently as Thursday, spokesmen for the Ryan campaign still insisted that Ryan would remain in the race. Ryan had defended himself saying, “There’s no breaking of any laws. There’s no breaking of any marriage laws. There’s no breaking of the Ten Commandments anywhere.”

—AP

Obama Eligibility Case Going to Trial

October 8, 2009 by nightwatch7

Federal District Judge David O. Carter has determined that the case against Barack Obama challenging his eligibility to be President under the rules of the Constitution will go forward. The schedule of trial dates has been set.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=112225

obama-nobamatvThe actual trial dates appear below as ordered by the court. The lead defense lawyer’s only comment reportedly was “Nuts.” 

“Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken under submission.

On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final.

Case Management dates are as follows:

Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.

File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009.

Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009

Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009

Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.

Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.”

As this site has reported since the beginning to this question on Obama’s eligibility to be President, it will be decided in Court. If Obama cannot finally produce documents proving he is a “natural born” citizen, such as a long-form birth certificate, then he holds the position illegally. Once his personal and college records are seen in Court, we will finally have an answer.

Obama Eligibility Case in Court Monday

October 2, 2009 by nightwatch7

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter will hold a hearing on Monday, October 5th, to determine if the Obama eligibility case will go forward. The U.S. Justice Department is trying to get the case dismissed on several technicalities, but it is expected that Carter will allow the case to go forward.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=111640

According to the WorldNetDaily article, “The California lawsuit is brought by several political candidates and party officials, including former U.S. ambassador Alan Keyes and Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson of the American Independent Party.” The lawsuit alleges that Barack Obama is ineligible to be President because he is not a “natural born” citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution.

So far all requests to see Obama’s original “long form” birth certificate have been refused by Obama’s lawyers and it is estimated that he has spent over $1,000,000 to keep his birth certificate from public view. This has left lawsuits as the only recourse to determine his eligibility to serve as President. Ultimately, this may have to be decided by the Supreme Court.

Obama Update: Mombasa Falsehood Exposed

September 13, 2009 by nightwatch7

A recent article on freerepublic.com has waylaid the falsehood that Mombasa was not part of Kenya in 1961 (which some claimed proved the recent birth certificates showing Obama was born there are forgeries). The article and a 1960 Kenya map from National Geographic show clearly that Mombasa was under British control at the time Obama was born in 1961 and not Zanzibar’s control as detractors had claimed. 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2334186/posts

Africa 1960 -- credit National Geographic

Africa 1960 -- credit National Geographic

http://www.maps.com/map.aspx?pid=15853

(To see Mombasa, zoom in on the east coast of Kenya on the map on the site above. You will also see that Zanzibar, off the coast, is clearly marked “U.K.”)

Whether or not the birth certificates showing Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya, are authentic remains to be proven in court (see previous articles on this site), but the contention that Mombasa was not part of Kenya in 1961 is false.

DNC Certification Fraud of Obama for President?

September 12, 2009 by nightwatch7

Two almost identical documents from the Democratic National Committee have surfaced certifying Obama as the party’s presidential candidate.  Both are signed by Nancy Pelosi and are notorized.  However, one document says that he is eligible under the Constitution to be a presidential candidate and the other eliminates that verification.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109363

If the Democratic National Committee and Nancy Pelosi knew there was a question regarding Obama’s eligibility to legally run for the presidency, then a question of election fraud becomes a real possibility. The certificate without the Constitutional reference is the one that was filed in every state. Look for this to come up in one of the next court cases challenging Obama’s eligibility.

Federal Judge Accepts Obama Eligibility Case!

September 9, 2009 by nightwatch7

Federal Judge David O. Carter has determined that one of the lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be President will go forward and proceed to trial in January. Despite a last minute attempt by Justice Department lawyers to have the lawsuit dismissed, the judge ordered a court date for discovery October 5, with arguments to take place January 11, 2010.obama-nobamatv

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109242

This is the first time one of the dozens of lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility under the Constitution’s requirement that the President be a “natural born” citizen has been heard in court. Controversy has continued for months, starting before the election, because Obama’s own grandmother has stated that he was born in Kenya, and it is known that his stepfather moved the family to Indonesia when Obama was a boy, which would have changed his citizenship.

In either case, it would make Obama ineligible to be President, and his steadfast, absolute refusal to provide his long-form birth certificate or his college records has only added to the controversy. It is estimated that so far he has spent close to $1,000,000 to keep his records secret from the public. 

Finally, after months of legal finagling and obstruction by Obama’s campaign and lawyers, the judge may rule that these records be brought to light. Then the truth will be known.

Obama Still Refuses to Show His Birth Certificate

August 27, 2009 by nightwatch7

This is a long-form birth certificate from Hawaii used in the early 1960s. It costs $12 or $15 to obtain an official copy from the state. Ask yourself: Why won’t any hospital in Hawaii confirm that Barack Obama was born there? Why would Obama spend $1,000,000 in legal fees to keep his birth certificate  hidden instead of just showing it and ending all of the controversy and the pending lawsuits?

Hawaiian birth certificate 1963We have to show our birth certificate when it’s requested to prove we are a citizen. Why won’t Obama show his?  What possible reason could he have that is worth $1,000,000 to keep it secret?