D.C. Court Case Demands Obama Prove Eligibility

Attorney Orly Taitz has filed a “Quo Warranto” case with the district court in Washington D.C. demanding that Obama show by what authority he is acting, meaning he must prove his eligibility, under the Constitution, to act as President. Article 2, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution requires that a president must be a “natural born” citizen of the United States. Obama has steadfastly refused to release his long-form birth certificate or any other records to prove his citizenship. Since it is known that his father was a British citizen,  questions have arisen.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123428

Taitz has previously filed Quo Warranto challenges on Obama with the U.S. Attorney General and with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in D.C.  Both were ignored. According to Constitutional experts, Quo Warranto, though seldom used, is the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials. 

Questions have been raised for some time because Obama has refused repeatedly to release any of his records or documents to the public. It is not just his birth certificate that is in question. He has had sealed all of his school records, college records, passport, medical records, Illinois State Bar records, and any baptism or adoption records.  Additionally, he has spent an estimated $1.7 million in legal fees to keep his records secret from the public, without explanation. If the Quo Warranto challenge is granted by the court, Obama will finally have to release his documents and show the public what he’s been hiding.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,


%d bloggers like this: