Obama is a British Citizen Claims Lawsuit; Healthcare Law Invalid Claims Second Lawsuit

In a legal brief filed with the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, attorney Mario Apuzzo claims that it doesn’t matter rather Obama is a “natural born citizen” or whether he was born in the United States or not because under the British Nationality Act of 1948 he is a British citizen.


Obama’s father was a British subject from Kenya, therefore, his son is also a British subject and under the U.S. Constitution a president cannot hold foreign or dual citizenship. This makes the argument of whether he was born in Hawaii or born in Kenya, according to Apuzzo, a moot point because no matter where he was born he held British citizenship because of his father. 

Apuzzo’s lawsuit on behalf of his clients contends that Obama does not meet the qualifications to be President, due to citizenship requirements as stated in Article 2, Section 1, and the Fourteenth Amendment. Since he began his campaign to be president, Obama has steadfastly refused to release his official birth certificate, but this lawsuit, if successful, would make his secrecy a non-issue. Dual citizenship is not allowed for the presidency of the United States.

In a related lawsuit, attorney Orly Taitz, now running for Attorney General in California, contends that since Obama has not shown he is a U.S. citizen by showing his birth certificate, and he does at least hold British citizenship, any legislation that he has signed is invalid, including the recent $1 trillion healthcare bill that the Democrats shoved through Congress against the wishes of the public.


If the court agrees and upholds the Constitution’s requirements for eligibility to be President, not only is Obama ineligible to be President, but every action he has taken will have been illegal. This could get interesting.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

%d bloggers like this: