Obama is Not a “Natural Born Citizen”

The language is legal, but this article (link below) by attorney Mario Apuzzo explains why from a historical standpoint Obama is not a “natural born citizen,” which is required by the Constitution to be President. The source is an article by David Ramsay, a founder and historian, published in 1789.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/founder-and-historian-david-ramsay.html

The article clearly states that the intention of the Founding Fathers of the United States was that a “natural born citizen” be the child of a mother and father who were both citizens of the United States. Therefore, regardless of where Obama was born, he does not qualify as his father was a British subject from Kenya who was in the United States as a student. He was not an American. Therefore, Obama may be an American citizen, if he was born in America, but he is not a “natural born citizen” by definition. Therefore, he is ineligible to legally be President of the United States.

Since Obama is a lawyer and studied constitutional law he must be well aware of this, which might explain why he has so steadfastly refused to release his birth certificate or other personal documents as they would confirm he is ineligible to serve as President. A hearing is scheduled for June 29th in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals which might finally resolve the matter.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


%d bloggers like this: