Posts Tagged ‘forgery’

Obama “Birth Certificate” a Forgery: Mathematical Proof

November 9, 2012

I honesty thought that this blog would be over on election day 2012 when  Obama would be voted out of office, not because of his ineligibility as should have happened years ago, but because of his dismal record. However, the issue of his Constitutional ineligibility is once again in play since his re-election, and now mathematical expert Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, former advisor to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, has released a sworn affidavit that the “birth certificate” released by the White House for Obama is definitely a forgery.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/win-or-lose-obama-was-not-and-is-not-the-president/

photo credit — WND

Lord Monckton, educated at Cambridge University, using probability analysis, explains in his affidavit in simple language how the chance of the numerous anamolies found in Obama’s “birth certificate” by forensic experts being accidental is astronomically high — on the order of 1 in 75 sextillion. In other words, impossible; the document is without a doubt a forgery. (See the affidavit, link below.)

http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/11/monckton_affidavit.pdf

Lord Monckton gave his affidavit at the request of the attorney for the plaintiff in one of the many cases that have been brought forth challenging Obama’s eligibility under the Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, to be president. Every House member and every Senator in Congress have also been approached and asked to bring up this issue. So far all have refused or have not responded. However, the article says that the issue and the affidavit are going forward. It is still a question if any court will have the courage to look into the issue and allow evidence to be brought forth. None have to date.

Israeli Science and Technology Database Says Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery

September 12, 2012

In a stunning article published on the Israeli national science website, an analysis of Obama’s long-form “birth certificate” released online by the White House last year has been determined to be a forgery. The website mentions that it should be of some concern that the man holding the most powerful postion in the world has a blatantly fake birth certificate.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/israeli-science-website-obama-birth-certificate-forged/

photo credit: atlas shrugs

Among other anomolies, the scientists discovered that the last digit of the birth certificate number is in a different font and under extreme magnification disappears, indicating it was altered by graphics software. Further analysis showed that the document is composed of two different groups of visual information sandwiched together to create the overall image, which would be impossible if it were a photocopied document as the White House claims. Other analyses are cited, including typogaphical and laying out of elements, all of which point directly to a forged docuement. The inescapable conclusion is that the “birth certificate” is an out and out forgery. (See earlier articles on this site for more detailed analyses.)

Mainstream American media refuse to examine or vet Obama and his documents, all of which have had their authenticity called into question, including his Social Security Card and his draft registration. So far analysis of these documents have only increased suspections that they are not genuine. All court challenges regarding Obama’s documents have been dismissed to date. No court wants to take on the explosive lawsuits filed and have to rule against a sitting President. Virtually all of them have been dismissed on legal technicalities. If the courts continue to refuse, it may be up to historians to publish the truth of Obama and his forged documents.

AZ Cold Case Posse Investigation: Obama Birth Certificate Likely a Forgery

March 2, 2012

After a six month investigation, a cold case posse in Arizona has concluded that there is probable cause that the Obama birth certificate released by the White House last year is a forgery. In addition they have identified more than one person of interest regarding the forgery. The presentation of their evidence noted their painstaking investigation and examined the numerous inconsistancies in the “birth certificate” that prove it was a computer created document and not a scan of a real birth certificate.

The investigators also released disturbing information that claims the Hawaii Department of Health and certain elected Hawaiian officials have participated in intentially interferring with efforts to allow the original birth certificate to be examined and authenticated, if it actually exists.

The posse, made up of former law enforcement officials and lawyers with law enforcement experience, also cast doubts on the authenticity of Obama’s selective service registration as the postmark is a fake and does not match postmarks from the same era. If the birth certificate and the selective service documents are both forgeries, then there is no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii nor that he is an American citizen, meaning that he is actually ineligible to be president under the regulations of the U.S. Constitution. The posse recommends that the investigation continue.

After the posse’s report, Sheriff Joe Arpaio now must decide how to proceed, but he said he thinks there needs to be a congressional investigation into the matter. However, at this point it is not clear where this evidence will go and who will continue the investigation.

Obama & Eligibility — Farewell for Now

January 1, 2012

Nightwatch blog began shortly before Obama was elected president of the United States. It was not my original intent to blog about politics or Obama or the question of his eligibility to be president. I actually expected the issue to be resolved years ago. I am astounding that such an important constitutional question still has not been heard in the courts of America; in fact they seem to be ducking the question and running for cover. The questions of his eligibility seem legitimate and loom large over our nation. Are we still a nation of law or have we chosen another path?

photo credit: atlas shrugs

The questions regarding Obama’s eligibility originate directly from the U.S. Constitution. Article 2, Section 1, states that  only a “natural born” citizen may be eligible to be President of the United States, and dual citizenship is not allowed. Obama’s eligibility is questionable on several accounts. Some of the major ones are listed below, plus there are over 200 articles and links on this blog that can be read and studied.

  • Obama is not a “natural born” citizen because his father, according to Obama, was a British subject from Kenya. A “natural born” citizen must have two U.S. citizen parents. In addition, since his father was British, Obama at best was a dual citizen, which is also not allowed.
  • According to Obama’s own grandmother who lives in Kenya, she attended Obama’s birth — in Kenya. She claimed he was not born in Hawaii but in Kenya in Mombasa. The African press has stated on more than one occasion that Obama is a Kenyan, African-born.
  • Obama’s mother remarried an Indonesian man and the family moved to Indonesia where Obama attended school under the name Barry Soetoro, indicating his stepfather adopted him. Also, only Indonesian Muslims could attend school, so Obama must have taken Indonesian citizenship as well, meaning he was no longer an American citizen.

Obama's Indonesian School Record

  • During his time in college it is known that Obama traveled to Pakistan; however, the year he went there American travel to Pakistan was prohibited because of international conflicts, so the only way he could have gotten into the country was on a foreign passport — perhaps an Indonesian passport.
  • Obama intentionally sealed all of his college and university records, without explanation, so it is impossible to see if he registered as an American student or a foreign student, like his father. Very few records are available about any facet of his life. He has spent an estimated $2 million so far to keep his records secret from the public.
  • Obama briefly posted his Selective Service card, but anomalies with the card and the year it was supposedly issued (red squares) were noted and it quickly disappeared from the internet.

  • A Certification of Live Birth was then posted on the internet, but it also came under scrutiny, especially when it was learned that they could be obtained simply on request. Complicating the issue was the fact that neither of the hospitals in Hawaii where Obama claimed to be born (yes, he’s claimed two different ones) have any record that he or his mother were ever in the hospitals.
  • Oddly, no doctor, nurse, or hospital worker has ever come forth claiming they attended Obama’s birth in Hawaii though monetary rewards were offered if someone would prove they attended his birth or saw him in the hospital as a newborn.

  • A search of government records showed that Obama’s Social Security card and number were issued in Connecticut, a state Obama never lived in. SS numbers are coded by the state that issues the card. Further search found that the number Obama is using was never issued to him.
  • However, a judge dismissed this because he felt the information was obtained without good faith and the person who accessed it had no legal reason to do so — though it came from the SS administration’s own site.
  • Finally, there is the whole controversy involving the posting of what purported to be Obama’s “official” birth certificate a full two plus years after he took office. However, it took the computer savvy less than an hour to determine that the “certificate” was actually photoshopped and likely fraudulent. Subsequently, several document, typographical, software, and computer experts have examined the certificate and have largely labeled it a forgery — and not a very good one. The list of anomalies is long, but some are very telling, such as having different typefaces (which a typewritten document from 1961 would not have). One expert went so far as to figure out exactly how the forgery was made and then recreated the “certificate” to prove it was forgery.

photo credit Irey -- WND

All of these stories and links to other articles and pictures of the documents in question are in the previous postings on this blog going back to fall of 2008. As I said, over 200. However, I am being called in another direction now and I will not be adding anymore to this blog unless and until this matter is finally resolved or something very major breaks.  Then there might be one last big story — if some court or the Supreme Court will finally agree to hear the case of Obama’s eligibility under the U.S. Constitution to be president and allow the evidence to be shown.

Farewell for now.

Obama’s Forged Birth Certificate Recreated

October 19, 2011

Computer graphics expert Ron Pollard has succeeded in duplicating Obama’s “birth certificate” in order to show how the forgery was accomplished. Pollard spend two months deconstructing, reverse engineering, then reconstructing the PDF document the White House claims is Obama’s “birth certificate” from Hawaii. His is the latest analysis of the computer document which has been examined by over 20 computer and imaging experts, most of whom have said the birth certificate is a fake. Pollard has produced a four-part video series showing and explaining how it was done (click the first link below).

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=357621

In the second part of the report (second link) Pollard recounts what he learned in the 800 hours of  deconstructing, forensic analysis, reconstruction, and testing of the duplicate he was able to create and give his views on the forger. Among those things, he says that he believes more than one person worked on the forgery, but there was a main forger who was expert in using “Adobe software products, including Acrobat, Illustrator and Photoshop, in its production,” according to the report on WND.  Surprisingly, he also believes the anomalies in the forgery were not mistakes, but left on purpose in order to draw criticism which could be countered by Obama supporters claiming they were naturally occurring with certain software. In all, Pollard says that construction of the forgery required over 100 individual precise steps and the forger paid close attention to every detail. Still, he says, it is a forgery.

Though Pollard’s analysis and duplication of the birth certificate PDF would seem to prove that it is a forgery, so far no court has been willing to hear any case or lawsuit challenging Obama’s eligibility as a “natural born” citizen to be heard on the merits of the case.  Various excuses and technicalities have used to avoid dealing with the issue in a court of law, but it is hoped that eventually the truth will be heard and a judgment rendered. In the meantime, the evidence continues to mount and most of it is not going in Obama’s favor.

Obama Birth Certificate Compared to Genuine BC

September 12, 2011

Professional typographer, Paul Irey, received permission to compare Obama’s “birth certificate” with a genuine 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate from a person born in the same hospital about three weeks after Obama was supposedly born there. There are striking differences in the typefaces of the two documents. Whereas Obama’s document is obviously composed of a variety of typefaces, which would be impossible on a typewriter, the genuine birth certificate has consistent typefaces throughout.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=342937

Irey has over 50 years experience including 25 creating documents on Macintosh computers. He explains that metal typewriter keys cannot produce letters that vary in style and size, yet the Obama document is full of such inconsistencies. He concludes that the only explanation is that the Obama “birth certificate” is a computer-generated forgery, a not a very good one.

picture credit: Irey -- WND

Irey had recently traveled to Hawaii expecting to be able to examine Obama’s “birth certificate” with attorney Orly Taitz, but the Hawaii Department of Vital Records refused to honor the subpoena and they were turned away. Taitz filed court papers in Hawaii to compel the department to comply with the subpoena, but that has not been ruled on yet.

A few cases are still winding their way through the courts challenging Obama’s eligibility to be President under the constitutional requirement that the President be a “natural born” citizen. It will be interesting to see how the court reacts to the evidence that Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery.

Judge Dismisses Obama Social Security Case

September 2, 2011

A federal judge in Washington D.C. has dismissed a case from attorney Orly Taitz requesting information from the Social Security Administration regarding Obama’s Social Security number. Questions have arisen since it was discovered that Obama’s Social Security number indicates it was issued in Connecticut, a state Obama never resided in.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=339629

Obama has said he grew up in Hawaii and therefore his Social Security number should bear numbers from being issued in Hawaii. It has been explained that the first three numbers of a Social Security number indicate the state that issued the card. Obama has offered no explanation as to why his number came from Connecticut.

Inquires about Obama’s Social Security number follow upon other lawsuits challenging his eligibility to be President which claim he is not a “natural born” citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution. Holding a fraudulent Social Security number is a federal offense and the lawsuit sought documentation on how Obama’s number was obtained.

Surprisingly to some, Judge Royce Lamberth said in his ruling that suspicion of fraud was not sufficient to grant the request and that the Privacy Act of 1974 protected personal information of number holders. Furthermore, the information on the number being possibly fraudulent was not his concern and he would ignore documents from the Social Security Verification System indicating such because they were obtained under false pretenses.

In short in appears that the judge has favored the Privacy Act of 1974 over the evidence that the man sitting in the Oval Office has a fraudulent Social Security number. Taitz has said that, using new evidence, she is submitting a motion for reconsideration. And so the drama continues.

Hawaii DOH Officials Refuse to Show Obama’s Birth Certificate — Ordered to Federal Court

August 10, 2011

As expected, Hawaii Department of Health officials on Monday refused a subpoena to show attorney Orly Taitz and her computer document experts Obama’s long form birth certificate, if it actually exists. DOH officials cited Hawaii’s privacy law forbidding the release of such documents unless authorized by the party who is subject to the document. Taitz then obtained an order from the U.S. District Court requiring that DOH officials appear in court September 14 and show cause as to why they refuse to abide by the subpoena. 

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=331517

Taitz represents clients in an ongoing lawsuit who challenge Obama’s eligibility to be President under the Constitutional requirement that the president must be a “natural born” citizen, usually interpreted to mean having parents who are both U.S. citizens. The White House released a document claimed to be Obama’s long form birth certificate in April, but it has been examined by several computer document experts and declared to be a forgery, a computer-generated paper, and not a scan of a 1961 typewritten birth certificate. (See stories below.)

Taitz says that the DOH officials’ claim that the “birth certificate” is protected by privacy law is moot as the White House released the document publicly on the internet in April. Privacy is no longer an issue once it was made public.

photo credit -- WND

Numerous questions surround the document released by the White House as it is problematic in several areas, including being composed of different fonts, showing evidence of “kerning” — which is proportional spacing between letters — impossible with typewritten documents, layering showing different parts of the document’s lettering and signatures in different electronic layers, anomalies in the background coloring and “halos,” Obama’s father being identified as “African” instead of “Negro” as he would have been in 1961, letter alignment problems, an apparent spelling error, etc. The list goes on and on.

If the court compels the Hawaiian DOH to show the document to Taitz and her experts, as is expected, it may galvanize the case against Obama and finally compel the court to take up the issue of Constitutional eligibility. So far no court in the country has had the courage to allow the case to be heard in open court. This could finally be the opening shot in a case of historic dimensions.  (Click on picture to see details.)

How Obama’s Certification of Live Birth Faked

August 10, 2011

Computer expert Dr. Ron Pollard, Ph.D., has come forward admitting the he forged the short form Certification of Live Birth that the White House released in April supposedly proving Obama was born in Hawaii. The short form document had been released in 2008, but it had come under scrutiny as a forgery just as the recent long form birth certificate has. The article posted on the WND site has a short YouTube video explaining and showing how he forged the certification.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=331525

photo credit WND

Pollard says that Hawaii did not copy or scan and send the certification as the White House claims. The White House took the certification they gave the press from the Snopes.com website. Ironically, it was Pollard’s fake that they took which Snopes had claimed was authentic.  Pollard explains how he made the document in Photoshop and proves it is his fake.

Pollard earned his Ph.D. in Instructional Systems and he is an expert in computer graphics and using printers and scanners to create digital images. He is the author of an ebook Alias Barack Obama: The Greatest Identity Fraud in History.

Obama Hawaiian Birth Certificate Subpoenaed

July 30, 2011

Attorney Orly Taitz has subpoenaed Obama’s original 1961 birth certificate from the State of Hawaii Department of Health. On August 8th she will be traveling to Honolulu where she will meet typography expert Paul Irey and computer imaging expert Doug Vogt to examine the original birth certificate, if it exists. Both experts have already examined the electronic version the White House posted on the internet in April and declare it a fraud. (See postings below.)

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=327373

Irey has pointed out that among other problems the White House version is composed of multiple typefaces — which would be impossible on a 1960s era typewriter– and shows evidence of “kerning” — the proportional spacing between letters found on computer-generated documents, but not with typewritten ones. After his examination of the electronic “birth certificate, “Vogt filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI claiming the “birth certificate” is a forgery for multiple reasons, such as parallax problems, for which he presented evidence.

photo credit Irey -- WND

Vogt further claims that they will hold a press conference later in the day August 8th and if the birth certificate on record at the Hawaii DOH varies from the one the White House released then criminal charges will immediately be filed for forgery, etc. Irey says that he will be able to tell within minutes of examining the original if the one released by the White House is fraudulent.

Through they have been stonewalling for months, years actually, refusing to show Obama’s original “birth certificate,” the Hawaii DOH has little recourse at this point but to comply or to refuse the subpoena. If they refuse, the judge in the case can compel them through court order to release the original. It is now only a matter of time before the question of Obama’s birth certificate, and whether he is a “natural born” American citizen, will come to light. If the original does not exist or does not match the version the White House released, the consequences will shake the presidency and the nation.