Posts Tagged ‘president’

Obama “Birth Certificate” on Way to Capitol Hill

June 5, 2013

After months of investigation by officials in Arizona into claims that Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent, lead investigator Mike Zullo recently made a public presentation of the evidence found to the annual convention of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association annual convention in St. Charles, MO. According to reports, those present were stunned, shocked, and outraged by the evidence presented showing that Obama’s “birth certificate” released by the White House was obviously a fraud created by computer graphics.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/obama-birth-certificate-doubts-head-to-capitol/#BPvqv1u4hdjg7OIA.99

Zullo also met recently with members of Congress concerned about the evidence the investigation has uncovered and were equally shocked by the findings. According to the WND article, “Several constitutional officers, public officials, attorneys, elected officials  and others are now pledging full and personal support for moving the issue to a  congressional investigation.” Evidence from this investigation was also included in “a legal case pending before the Alabama Supreme Court,” and Zullo entered the information investigators found in an affidavit to the court.

Obama Birth Certificate2Some years ago during Obama’s first term, after bragging he would end the controversy once and for all, the governor of Hawaii was unexplainably unable to produce Obama’s birth certificate from the state’s official records. Obama’s people also released a Selective Service card for him, but that also appeared to be fraudulent. As pressure mounted on Obama before the last election to show documentation, the White House released the “birth certificate” online where analysis easily showed it to be a computer generated document and not genuine. (See stories below for details.)  Mainstream media ignored all of this for the most part, and several of those at the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association annual convention were alarmed to see such evidence had been routinely dismissed if not ridiculed by the press.

Other documents which other presidents and those in Congress and the federal government usually release regarding their past Obama has steadfastly refused to release, including: Obama’s adoption records, official documents of his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens on return from Indonesia, his official name change  from Barry Sotero (his name in Indonesia) to Barack Obama after returning to the U. S.,  his Occidental College  records, his Harvard Law School records, his Columbia College senior thesis, his Columbia College records, his record with Illinois State Bar Association,  his passport records (especially explaining his trip to Pakistan in the 1970s when U.S. citizens were not allowed to go there). This list is by no means complete and Obama continues to refuse to let anyone see his records. Some he has taken legal action to hide from the American public.

It had appeared that this scandal and cover up was going to have to wait for historians to sort is out, but this sudden interest in the claims of fraud from law enforcement officials and the Alabama Supreme Court may drive the truth forward sooner than expected.

Obama “Birth Certificate” a Forgery: Mathematical Proof

November 9, 2012

I honesty thought that this blog would be over on election day 2012 when  Obama would be voted out of office, not because of his ineligibility as should have happened years ago, but because of his dismal record. However, the issue of his Constitutional ineligibility is once again in play since his re-election, and now mathematical expert Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, former advisor to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, has released a sworn affidavit that the “birth certificate” released by the White House for Obama is definitely a forgery.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/win-or-lose-obama-was-not-and-is-not-the-president/

photo credit — WND

Lord Monckton, educated at Cambridge University, using probability analysis, explains in his affidavit in simple language how the chance of the numerous anamolies found in Obama’s “birth certificate” by forensic experts being accidental is astronomically high — on the order of 1 in 75 sextillion. In other words, impossible; the document is without a doubt a forgery. (See the affidavit, link below.)

http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/11/monckton_affidavit.pdf

Lord Monckton gave his affidavit at the request of the attorney for the plaintiff in one of the many cases that have been brought forth challenging Obama’s eligibility under the Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, to be president. Every House member and every Senator in Congress have also been approached and asked to bring up this issue. So far all have refused or have not responded. However, the article says that the issue and the affidavit are going forward. It is still a question if any court will have the courage to look into the issue and allow evidence to be brought forth. None have to date.

Summing Up Obama by Mychal Massie

September 9, 2012
      The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn’t like the Obama’s?   Specifically I was asked: “I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama’s?   It seems personal, not policy related.   You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture.”
      The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation.   I’ve made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas.   As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don’t like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.
      I don’t hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America.  They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama’s raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
      I don’t like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress.   I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same.   President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people.  The Reagan’s made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish.   His arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable.   Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?
      Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama’s have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths.   They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.
      I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able to be proud of America.   I view that statement and that Mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world.  Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.
      I have a saying, that “the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide.”   No president in history has spent over a million dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.
      And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies.   He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother’s death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family.   He has lied about his father’s military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea.   He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address.   He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman.   He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today.   He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support.   He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel.
      His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world).   I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement – as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.
      I don’t like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies.   We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.
      Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies.   And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.
      It is my intention to do all within my ability to ensure their reign is one term.  I could go on, but let me conclude with this.  I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are.   There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.
      As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, “Nero In The White House” – “Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader.  He is the most mendacious (Synonyms:   lying – false – untrue – untruthful – double-tongued ) political figure I have ever witnessed.   Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious (Synonyms:recalcitrant – refractory – obstinate – disobedient) arrogance is unequalled.  Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood…
      Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders.   He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement – while America’s people go homeless, hungry and unemployed.”

Florida Judge to Consider Obama’s Eligibility

June 1, 2012

A Florida judge has scheduled a hearing for Obama’s lawyers to explain why “natural born citizen” does not mean the child of two American citizens. Judge Terry Lewis made critical rulings during the Bush-Gore presidential election in 2000 that were eventually decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Attorney Larry Klayman has brought forward a suit from a registered Democrat challenging Obama’s eligibility to be President under the Constitution’s requirement under Article 2, Section 1,  that the president be a “natural born” citizen of the United States of America.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/bush-v-gore-judge-your-evidence-mr-obama/

As the Constitution does not explain the term “natural born” citizen, Klayman’s case cites the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Minor v. Happersett from 1875 in which the Court said that a “natural born” citizen is the offspring of parents who are both citizens of the United States. This is not the same as a “citizen” or a “native born” citizen, in which case citizenship can be conferred simply by being born in the United States. The Constitution makes a special requirement for the Office of President; both parents must be U.S. citizens.

Since it is known Obama’s father was a British subject from Kenya, there have been dozens of lawsuits filed since before he was elected challenging his eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States, but none of the lawsuits have had a full hearing; all have been dismissed on technicalities or put aside. This hearing is significant because it is the first time a hearing will be held on the legal definition of “natural born” citizen. If the judge holds by the decision of the Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett, it could bring serious reappraisal to Obama’s claim to be eligible to be President.

So far courts and judges have run from having to make a ruling on Obama’s eligibility for office. However, if Judge Lewis is not satisfied with Obama’s lawyers’ explanations and finds that Obama does not meet the requirements under the U.S. Constitution, the challenge to his eligibility may finally be heard and will undoubtably end up in the U.S. Supreme Court.

1991 Literary Agent: Obama “born in Kenya”

May 17, 2012

A 1991 promotional booklet from Obama’s literary agent clearly states that Obama was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.” The agency was promoting what was to be Obama’s first book, Journeys in Black and White, a effort he later abandoned. The booklet came from Acton & Dystel who was representing him at that time.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/Obama-pamphlet-in-use-2007

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/revealed-bio-names-obamas-birthplace/

Acton and Dystel have gone their separate ways, but Dystel still lists Obama among her client list and claimed Obama was born in Kenya until 2007 when he announced his run for president. It was then changed to read “born in Hawaii.” Acton spoke with Brietbart News and confirmed the details of the listing for Obama. Dystel refused to respond to inquires about the booklet and the statements published.

Though intriguing, and yet another piece in the puzzle that is Obama, the mainstream media’s and Congress’ refusual to investigate Obama’s background and birthplace continue to create a potentially diasterous constitutional crisis.  If  it is true that Obama was born in Kenya, as the African media has long acknowledged, then he is not and never has been eligibe to be President of the United States. That would mean that everything he has done and signed while acting as President is illegal and fraudulent.

It is amazing that these questions have gone on this long without being resolved. The citizens of the United States deserve to know whether or not Obama is constitutionally eligible for office or not, but he has steadfastly refused to release his personal and college information, and the “birth certificate” that was released was a poorly photoshopped creation. After this long, the consequences could be severe for America as he has relentlessly pushed his agenda on the nation. This issue needs to be settled once and for all.

AZ Cold Case Posse Investigation: Obama Birth Certificate Likely a Forgery

March 2, 2012

After a six month investigation, a cold case posse in Arizona has concluded that there is probable cause that the Obama birth certificate released by the White House last year is a forgery. In addition they have identified more than one person of interest regarding the forgery. The presentation of their evidence noted their painstaking investigation and examined the numerous inconsistancies in the “birth certificate” that prove it was a computer created document and not a scan of a real birth certificate.

The investigators also released disturbing information that claims the Hawaii Department of Health and certain elected Hawaiian officials have participated in intentially interferring with efforts to allow the original birth certificate to be examined and authenticated, if it actually exists.

The posse, made up of former law enforcement officials and lawyers with law enforcement experience, also cast doubts on the authenticity of Obama’s selective service registration as the postmark is a fake and does not match postmarks from the same era. If the birth certificate and the selective service documents are both forgeries, then there is no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii nor that he is an American citizen, meaning that he is actually ineligible to be president under the regulations of the U.S. Constitution. The posse recommends that the investigation continue.

After the posse’s report, Sheriff Joe Arpaio now must decide how to proceed, but he said he thinks there needs to be a congressional investigation into the matter. However, at this point it is not clear where this evidence will go and who will continue the investigation.

“Obama Eligibility Court Case — Blow by Blow”

January 28, 2012

Obama and his lawyers were a no show at an administrative court hearing in Atlanta two days ago to determine whether he met the eligibility requirements to be a candidate for the presidency as given in the U.S. Constitution. The link below is a quick blow by blow of the proceedings and what was entered and was said in the court.

http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138

Though the mainstream media by and large ignored the hearing, it will be interesting to see what follows if the administrative judge deems Obama ineligible to appear on the ballot in Georgia to run for president. With the evidence given to the court, it is hard to imagine that he would qualify to be on the ballot in November. If other states follow, this could create real problems for the Democrats and Obama.

Obama Fails to Show for Eligibility Hearing

January 27, 2012
Yesterday in Atlanta an administrative law judge heard from plaintiffs claiming Obama is ineligible to appear on the ballot in Georgia because he is not a “natural born” citizen as required of a presidential candidate by the U.S. Constitution. This is the first time a court has agreed to hear evidence regarding Obama’s status as a “natural born” citizen.  Incredibly, Obama and his lawyers chose to ignore the court and did not appear at the hearing or try to deny the claim or prove that he is eligible.

photo credit: atlas shrugs

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-warns-obama-of-peril-of-ignoring-eligibility-hearing/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-court-told-obama-slam-dunk-disqualified/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/eligibility-attorney-obama-needs-impeaching/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/constitutional-expert-says-arguments-over-barack-sr-strong/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-accused-of-disrespecting-court-state-americans/

This issue has been the subject of various lawsuits since 2008 because “natural born” citizen is usually understood to mean that both parents are American citizens. Yet in his autobiography Obama acknowlegded that his father was a British citizen from Kenya. The U.S. Constitution specifically forbids presidential candidates to be foreign born or to hold dual citizenship. However, until now every single court has refused to hear evidence on the issue, usually citing some reason such as the plaintiffs lacking standing; that is until yesterday.

The court in Atlanta did not issue a judgment immediately, but by not showing, the judge is likely to declare a default judgment (meaning Obama loses by default, failure to appear), which will then be recommended to the Secretary of State who has the final say on whether or not Obama’s name will appear on the ballot. If his name is not on the ballot, he will not receive any electoral votes from Georgia. Similar lawsuits are waiting to be heard in other states within the next few months.

If these lawsuits prevail, Obama’s time in office may come to an end sooner than he would like. It’s going to get much more interesting from hereon out.

Obama & Eligibility — Farewell for Now

January 1, 2012

Nightwatch blog began shortly before Obama was elected president of the United States. It was not my original intent to blog about politics or Obama or the question of his eligibility to be president. I actually expected the issue to be resolved years ago. I am astounding that such an important constitutional question still has not been heard in the courts of America; in fact they seem to be ducking the question and running for cover. The questions of his eligibility seem legitimate and loom large over our nation. Are we still a nation of law or have we chosen another path?

photo credit: atlas shrugs

The questions regarding Obama’s eligibility originate directly from the U.S. Constitution. Article 2, Section 1, states that  only a “natural born” citizen may be eligible to be President of the United States, and dual citizenship is not allowed. Obama’s eligibility is questionable on several accounts. Some of the major ones are listed below, plus there are over 200 articles and links on this blog that can be read and studied.

  • Obama is not a “natural born” citizen because his father, according to Obama, was a British subject from Kenya. A “natural born” citizen must have two U.S. citizen parents. In addition, since his father was British, Obama at best was a dual citizen, which is also not allowed.
  • According to Obama’s own grandmother who lives in Kenya, she attended Obama’s birth — in Kenya. She claimed he was not born in Hawaii but in Kenya in Mombasa. The African press has stated on more than one occasion that Obama is a Kenyan, African-born.
  • Obama’s mother remarried an Indonesian man and the family moved to Indonesia where Obama attended school under the name Barry Soetoro, indicating his stepfather adopted him. Also, only Indonesian Muslims could attend school, so Obama must have taken Indonesian citizenship as well, meaning he was no longer an American citizen.

Obama's Indonesian School Record

  • During his time in college it is known that Obama traveled to Pakistan; however, the year he went there American travel to Pakistan was prohibited because of international conflicts, so the only way he could have gotten into the country was on a foreign passport — perhaps an Indonesian passport.
  • Obama intentionally sealed all of his college and university records, without explanation, so it is impossible to see if he registered as an American student or a foreign student, like his father. Very few records are available about any facet of his life. He has spent an estimated $2 million so far to keep his records secret from the public.
  • Obama briefly posted his Selective Service card, but anomalies with the card and the year it was supposedly issued (red squares) were noted and it quickly disappeared from the internet.

  • A Certification of Live Birth was then posted on the internet, but it also came under scrutiny, especially when it was learned that they could be obtained simply on request. Complicating the issue was the fact that neither of the hospitals in Hawaii where Obama claimed to be born (yes, he’s claimed two different ones) have any record that he or his mother were ever in the hospitals.
  • Oddly, no doctor, nurse, or hospital worker has ever come forth claiming they attended Obama’s birth in Hawaii though monetary rewards were offered if someone would prove they attended his birth or saw him in the hospital as a newborn.

  • A search of government records showed that Obama’s Social Security card and number were issued in Connecticut, a state Obama never lived in. SS numbers are coded by the state that issues the card. Further search found that the number Obama is using was never issued to him.
  • However, a judge dismissed this because he felt the information was obtained without good faith and the person who accessed it had no legal reason to do so — though it came from the SS administration’s own site.
  • Finally, there is the whole controversy involving the posting of what purported to be Obama’s “official” birth certificate a full two plus years after he took office. However, it took the computer savvy less than an hour to determine that the “certificate” was actually photoshopped and likely fraudulent. Subsequently, several document, typographical, software, and computer experts have examined the certificate and have largely labeled it a forgery — and not a very good one. The list of anomalies is long, but some are very telling, such as having different typefaces (which a typewritten document from 1961 would not have). One expert went so far as to figure out exactly how the forgery was made and then recreated the “certificate” to prove it was forgery.

photo credit Irey -- WND

All of these stories and links to other articles and pictures of the documents in question are in the previous postings on this blog going back to fall of 2008. As I said, over 200. However, I am being called in another direction now and I will not be adding anymore to this blog unless and until this matter is finally resolved or something very major breaks.  Then there might be one last big story — if some court or the Supreme Court will finally agree to hear the case of Obama’s eligibility under the U.S. Constitution to be president and allow the evidence to be shown.

Farewell for now.

9th Circuit Court of Appeals Dismisses Obama Suit

January 1, 2012

Right before Christmas, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco finally released its ruling on the lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution. The Court dismissed the cases and refused discovery basically saying that whereas the plantiffs might have “competitive standing” to sue, Obama’s  inauguration wiped out any claims the plaintiffs had about the election being unfair. In other words, this ruling means that once he took office, it’s too late to challenge the election whether there was fraud or not.

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=380197

The plaintiffs in these cases included two 2008 presidential candidates, Alan Keyes and Gail Lightfoot, and one vice presidential candidate, Wiley S. Drake, plus other officials and interested parties. The judges stated in their surprising opinion that once Obama was sworn in the plaintiffs were no longer candidates, therefore their claims to an unfair election disappeared with the administration of the oath of office since the lawsuit was filed hours later, meaning too late.

Currently, the attorneys for the plaintiffs are weighing their next move, though attorney Orly Taitz has vowed to fight on until all avenues are exhausted and justice is done. So far no court in the country has agreed to hear the case on its merits and most have dismissed the dozens of cases brought forth on various technicalities, usually on the question of standing, though the Ninth Circuit may have put a crack in that claim.

It is well known that Obama’s father was a British subject from Kenya and that the U.S. Contitution does not allow dual citizenship for the office of president. A president must be a “natural born” citizen meaning both parents must be U.S. citizens. Sooner or later the Court will have to rule on the constitutionality of Obama’s presidency, hopefully before the next election.